🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.